Skip to content
Can’t Decide What to Play Next? How to Stop Staring at Your Library

Can’t Decide What to Play Next? How to Stop Staring at Your Library

Fred
Fred · · 8 min read

It’s 9 PM. The house is quiet. You’ve got a solid two hours before you need to sleep. You sit down, pick up your controller, and open your library.

Then you scroll. And scroll. And scroll.

You hover over Elden Ring. Too much commitment for a Tuesday. Baldur’s Gate 3? You can’t remember where you left off. That indie game you bought last month? Maybe. You keep scrolling. Twenty minutes pass. You open YouTube. Thirty minutes later you’re watching someone else play the game you could’ve been playing this whole time.

I do this constantly. And based on the sheer number of forum threads, Reddit posts, and Quora questions about this exact problem, so does everybody else.

One guy on a Steam discussion board said picking his next game takes him “three to ten days.” He’s in his 30s, doesn’t have a ton of free time, and said choosing feels like “a big deal now because I don’t want to waste my time on something that I will not enjoy.” A commenter on NeoGAF with 398 Steam games admitted he starts a game, quits after 10 minutes, starts another, quits that too, and ends up playing nothing. Someone on PSNProfiles described the exact same cycle and called it “paralysis.”

That’s the word. Paralysis. You have so many options that you pick none of them.

Why This Happens (And Why It’s Getting Worse)

There’s actually a name for this. Psychologists call it “choice overload.” When you have too many options, making a decision gets harder, not easier. And the more you care about the outcome, the worse it gets.

Here’s why gaming hits this so hard when you’re an adult.

When you were a kid, you had maybe five games. You played whatever was in the disc tray. No decision needed. Now you’ve got Steam libraries with hundreds of titles, a Game Pass subscription adding new stuff weekly, PlayStation Plus dropping games you didn’t ask for, and a shelf of physical games collecting dust. The options are borderline infinite.

And your time isn’t. That’s the killer combo. When you only have two hours, every session feels high-stakes. Pick the wrong game and you’ve “wasted” a night. So you spend your limited time trying to make the perfect choice instead of playing anything at all.

One person on a Retro Game Boards thread nailed it: “Overchoice takes place when the advantages of diversity and individualization are canceled by the complexity of the decision.” Translation: having 200 games is great until you have to pick one.

The Scroll-and-Quit Loop

Here’s the pattern I see over and over, in forums, in my own life, and in conversations with friends who game.

Step one: Open library. Step two: Scroll through options. Step three: Nothing jumps out. Step four: Pick something half-heartedly. Step five: Play for 10 minutes, feel restless, quit. Step six: Open YouTube or Reddit instead. Step seven: Go to bed feeling like you wasted the night.

A commenter on Giant Bomb described it perfectly: “We don’t speak of the backlog. Let it rest.” That’s someone who gave up entirely. Not because they don’t want to play, but because the decision itself became exhausting.

And it’s not laziness. It’s decision fatigue. You spent all day at work making decisions. What to prioritize, how to respond to that email, what to eat for lunch. By 9 PM your brain is tapped out. Asking it to make one more choice, even a fun one, can feel like too much.

How to Actually Break the Cycle

I’m not going to tell you to “just pick something.” If that worked, you wouldn’t be reading this. Here are the things that actually helped me stop staring at my library and start playing.

Build a “Next Up” Shortlist (Max 3 Games)

This is the single most effective thing I’ve done. Instead of scrolling through your entire library every time you sit down, maintain a shortlist of three games. That’s it. Three.

One long game you’re working through. One shorter game for when you don’t have much time. One game you haven’t started but you’re excited about.

When you sit down to play, you’re not choosing from 200 games. You’re choosing from three. And choosing from three is easy. You update the shortlist only when you finish or drop one of the three. This removes the decision from the moment you sit down and moves it to a less pressured time, like a Sunday morning when you’re thinking about what to play that week.

Sort by Energy Level, Not by Title

Alphabetical order is useless for picking a game. So is “most recently added.” Neither of those tells you anything about whether a game fits your mood right now.

Try organizing your library by the kind of session you’re looking for:

Brain is fried, just want to zone out. Cozy games, games you’ve already beaten, anything relaxing. Stardew Valley, Animal Crossing, a replay of something you love.

Got 30 minutes or less. Roguelikes, pick-up-and-play games, anything with short runs. Hades, Dead Cells, Slay the Spire.

Feeling focused and ready to be challenged. The big stuff. Elden Ring, Baldur’s Gate 3, whatever demands your full attention.

Want something social. Co-op games, anything you can play with a friend online.

When you sit down and ask “what should I play,” you stop asking the question entirely. Instead you ask “what kind of session am I in the mood for?” That’s a much easier question to answer. Your brain knows the answer to that one almost instantly.

Use the Five-Minute Rule

This one comes from productivity advice but it works perfectly for gaming. The rule is simple: commit to playing something for just five minutes. That’s all. If you’re not into it after five minutes, you can stop.

What happens most of the time? You keep playing. Starting is the hard part. Once you’re in a game, the momentum takes over. The five-minute rule removes the pressure of commitment (“what if I play for an hour and don’t enjoy it?”) and replaces it with a tiny ask that feels easy to say yes to.

I’ve used this dozens of times. It works about 80% of the time. The other 20%, I stop after five minutes and try the next game on my shortlist. No guilt. Just information.

Try a Randomizer (Seriously)

This sounds dumb. I thought it was dumb. Then I tried it.

Multiple people on Hard Forum and Retro Game Boards swear by using a random number generator to pick their next game. You number your shortlist (or your full list, if you’re feeling bold), plug the numbers into a randomizer, and play whatever it spits out. No backsies.

Here’s why it works: it removes the decision entirely. You’re not choosing. The randomizer chose for you. And weirdly, once the pressure of choosing is gone, you’re way more likely to actually enjoy whatever you land on. One commenter said “the RNG just forces me to pick something and just go with it” and that it’s the only thing that broke his cycle.

You can get fancy with this (wheel spinners, apps that randomize your Steam library), or you can just ask a friend to pick a number between 1 and 10. The point is to take your overthinking brain out of the equation.

I don’t use this every time. But when I’m truly stuck and my shortlist isn’t helping, rolling the dice has gotten me to play games I’d been ignoring for months. And some of those turned out to be great.

Stop Treating Every Session Like It Needs to Be Perfect

This is the mindset shift that changed things for me. Not every gaming session needs to be incredible. Not every game you play needs to be a masterpiece. Sometimes you play something mid for an hour, have an okay time, and go to bed. That’s fine.

The search for the “perfect” game to play tonight is what causes the paralysis in the first place. You’re trying to min-max a leisure activity, which is a very adult-brain thing to do. Your kid self didn’t do this. They just played whatever was there and had fun.

Lower the bar. “Good enough” is good enough. A mediocre gaming session still beats scrolling Reddit for two hours.

Track What You’ve Played So You Know Where You Left Off

One of the sneakiest causes of decision paralysis is forgetting where you were in a game. You want to play Persona 5 but you can’t remember what palace you were in. You’re interested in going back to The Witcher 3 but you forgot what quest you were on. So instead of dealing with the confusion, you just pick something else. Or nothing.

This is where keeping a simple log makes a real difference. Not a spreadsheet. Just a quick note when you stop playing: “Finished chapter 3, heading to the mountain area next” or “Level 24, about to fight the second boss.”

That one sentence saves you 15 minutes of confusion the next time you sit down. And it removes “I don’t remember where I was” as an excuse to avoid a game.

When the Problem Is Bigger Than Your Library

I want to be real about something. Sometimes the “can’t pick a game” problem isn’t really about games. It’s about burnout.

If nothing in your library sounds appealing. If you start games and quit them all within minutes. If gaming feels like a chore instead of a release. You might just need a break. Not from a specific game. From gaming in general.

That’s okay. It doesn’t mean you’ve “outgrown” games or that something is wrong with you. It means your brain needs something different for a while. Go for a walk. Read a book. Watch a movie. The games will be there when you come back, and they’ll feel fresh when you do.

I took an unplanned two-week break from gaming last year. When I came back, I picked up Dead Cells on a whim and had one of the best gaming sessions I’d had in months. Sometimes the answer to “what should I play next” is “nothing, for now.”

A Tool That Helps With All of This

I built SavePoint partly because of this problem. It tracks your video games and board games in one place, lets you add journal notes so you always know where you left off, and gives you XP and streaks for logging games so you’re motivated to keep the habit going.

But the part that helps most with decision paralysis is having your library organized and your progress documented. When you open SavePoint, you can see at a glance what you’re currently playing, what you recently finished, and what’s on deck. No scrolling through 200 titles trying to remember which ones you actually care about.

It’s not the only way to solve this problem. But it’s the one that worked for me, so I built it for everyone else dealing with the same thing.

Your Two Hours Are Yours

Here’s what I want you to take from this.

The decision about what to play should take 30 seconds, not 30 minutes. Build a shortlist. Sort by energy. Use the five-minute rule. Stop optimizing and start playing.

And if nothing sounds good tonight, that’s fine too. Close the library, do something else, come back tomorrow. Gaming is supposed to be the fun part of your day. Don’t let the choosing ruin it.

Your two hours are limited. Spend them playing, not deciding.


Still stuck in the scroll-and-quit loop? We get it. Come talk about it in the TAG community, or try SavePoint to organize your library the way your brain actually works.

More in this hub
TAG Guides

TAG Guides is for anyone looking for video game strategy or gaming setup advice.

FAQ

What is 'choice overload' and why does it happen with gaming libraries?
Choice overload is when having too many options actually makes decisions harder, not easier. Gaming hits this especially hard because you might have hundreds of games across Steam, Game Pass, and PlayStation Plus, but limited time to play them. When you only have two hours free, picking the wrong game feels like wasting your night, so you end up spending all that time deciding instead of playing.
What's the 'Next Up' shortlist method and how does it work?
Instead of scrolling through your entire library every time you play, maintain a shortlist of just three games: one long game you're working through, one shorter game for quick sessions, and one new game you're excited about. You only update it when you finish or drop a game. This removes the decision from the moment you sit down and makes choosing from three games way easier than choosing from hundreds.
How does the five-minute rule help break the scroll-and-quit cycle?
You commit to playing something for just five minutes with no pressure to continue. Most of the time you'll keep playing once you get going because starting is the hard part. If you're genuinely not into it after five minutes, you can stop guilt-free and try the next game on your shortlist. The author says this works about 80% of the time.
Why would using a randomizer actually help me pick a game?
A randomizer removes the decision entirely, which sounds weird but actually works. You number your games, use a random number generator or wheel spinner, and play whatever it picks. Since the pressure of choosing is gone, you're more likely to enjoy what you land on. Multiple forum users swear it's the only thing that broke their decision paralysis cycle.
How should I organize my gaming library if alphabetical order isn't working?
Sort by energy level and mood instead. Create categories like 'Brain is fried' (cozy games like Stardew Valley), 'Got 30 minutes or less' (roguelikes like Hades), 'Feeling focused' (big games like Elden Ring), and 'Want something social' (co-op games). When you sit down, ask 'what kind of session am I in the mood for?' instead of 'what game should I play?', your brain answers that instantly.

Written by

Fred
Fred LEVEL 1

Fred has been gaming since his dad brought home a recycled PC from work and installed Hugo's House of Horrors as a toddler. He continues to play games almost daily across PC, console and mobile and may have a slightly addictive personality.

🎯 Your byline could be here

TAG creators write about the games they actually play, and keep 60% of the ad revenue. No editorial gatekeeping.

Apply to write →

MORE LIKE THIS